« Prev |
2016 Jul-Sep; Vol 7, No 3:e4 |
Next » |
e4 |
The Prosthetic Influence and Biomechanics on Peri-Implant Strain: a Systematic Literature Review of Finite Element Studies J Oral Maxillofac Res 2016;7(3):e4 doi:10.5037/jomr.2016.7304 |
The Prosthetic Influence and Biomechanics on Peri-Implant Strain: a Systematic Literature Review of Finite Element Studies
1Department of Prosthodontics, Lithuanian Universty of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.
2Vilnius Implantology Center, Vilnius, Lithuania.
3Prosthetic Dentistry and Stomatognathic Physiology, Research Unit of Oral Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oulu, Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu, Finland.
4Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, Lithuanian Universty of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Corresponding Author:
Kursiu 56-20, 48133, Kaunas
Lithuania
E-mail: j.maminskas@gmail.com
ABSTRACT
Objectives: To systematically review risks of mechanical impact on peri-implant strain and prosthetic influence on stability across finite element studies.
Material and Methods: An online literature search was performed on MEDLINE and EMBASE databases published between 2011 and 2016. Following keywords tiered screening and selection of the title, abstract and full-text were performed. Studies of finite element analysis (FEA) were considered for inclusion that were written in English and revealed stress concentrations or strain at peri-implant bone level.
Results: There were included 20 FEA studies in total. Data were organized according to the following topics: bone layers, type of bone, osseointegration level, bone level, design of implant, diameter and length of implant, implant-abutment connection, type of supra-construction, loading axis, measurement units. The stress or strain at implant-bone contact was measured over all studies and numerical values estimated. Risks of overloading were accented as non-axial loading, misfits, cantilevers and the stability of peri-implant bone was related with the usage of platform switch connection of abutment.
Conclusions: Peri-implant area could be affected by non-axial loading, cantilever prosthetic elements, crown/implant ratio, type of implant-abutment connection, misfits, properties of restoration materials and antagonistic tooth. The heterogeneity of finite element analysis studies limits systematization of data. Results of these studies are comparable with other findings of in vitro, in vivo, prospective and retrospective studies.
J Oral Maxillofac Res 2016;7(3):e4
doi: 10.5037/jomr.2016.7304
Accepted for publication: 7 September 2016
Keywords: dental implants; dental stress analysis; finite element analysis; peri-implantitis; treatment failure.
To cite this article: The Prosthetic Influence and Biomechanics on Peri-Implant Strain: a Systematic Literature Review of Finite Element Studies J Oral Maxillofac Res 2016;7(3):e4 URL: http://www.ejomr.org/JOMR/archives/2016/3/e4/v7n3e4ht.htm |
Received: 18 July 2016 | Accepted: 7 September 2016 | Published: 9 September 2016
Copyright: © The Author(s). Published by JOMR under CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 licence, 2016.