« Prev |
2019 Jul-Sep; Vol 10, No 3:e6 |
Next » |
e6 |
The Influence of Different Grafting Materials on Alveolar Ridge Preservation: a Systematic Review J Oral Maxillofac Res 2019;10(3):e6 doi:10.5037/jomr.2019.10306 Abstract | HTML | PDF | XML |
The Influence of Different Grafting Materials on Alveolar Ridge Preservation: a Systematic Review
1Department of Periodontics and Oral Medicine, University of Michigan School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
2Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
3Department of Periodontics, University of Iowa College of Dentistry, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
4Department of Periodontics, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center - College of Dentistry, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA.
Corresponding Author:
Department of Periodontics
University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center
1201 N Stonewall Ave, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73117
USA
Phone: (405) 271-8001
Fax: (405) 271-3794
E-mail: fsuarezla@gmail.com
ABSTRACT
Objectives: The purpose of the present review was to evaluate the effect of different bone substitutes used for alveolar ridge preservation on the post extraction dimensional changes.
Material and Methods: An electronic literature search in MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE (OVID) and Cochrane (CENTRAL) were performed, in addition to a manual search through all periodontics and implantology-related journals, up to December 2018. Inverse variance weighted means were calculated for all the treatment arms of the included trials for the quantitative analysis.
Results: Forty randomized controlled trials were included in the quantitative analysis. Dimensional changes were obtained from clinical measurements and three-dimensional imaging. The average amount of horizontal ridge resorption was 1.52 (SD 1.29) mm (allograft), 1.47 (SD 0.92) mm (xenograft), 2.31 (SD 1.19) mm (alloplast) and 3.1 (SD 1.07) mm for unassisted healing. Similarly, for all the evaluated parameters, the spontaneous healing of the socket led to higher bone loss rate than the use of a bone grafting material.
Conclusions: The utilization of a bone grafting material for alveolar ridge preservation reduces the resorption process occurring after tooth extraction. However, minimal differences in resorption rate were observed between allogeneic, xenogeneic and alloplastic grafting materials.
J Oral Maxillofac Res 2019;10(3):e6
doi: 10.5037/jomr.2019.10306
Accepted for publication: 19 July 2019
Keywords: alveolar bone atrophy; alveolar bone grafting; alveolar process atrophy; bone remodeling; evidence-based dentistry.
To cite this article: Majzoub J, Ravida A, Starch-Jensen T, Tattan M, Suárez-López del Amo F. The Influence of Different Grafting Materials on Alveolar Ridge Preservation: a Systematic Review J Oral Maxillofac Res 2019;10(3):e6 URL: http://www.ejomr.org/JOMR/archives/2019/3/e6/v10n3e6ht.htm |
Received: 19 July 2019 | Accepted: 5 September 2019 | Published: 5 September 2019
Copyright: © The Author(s). Published by JOMR under CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 licence, 2019.